[PD] more paths in pd extended

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri May 4 21:46:29 CEST 2007


Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

>> AFAIK it does not work yet - but it should not be that hard to
>> implement ...
> 
> That does not work and would be a pain to implement.

why?

> 
> I think that there should just be a libdir called "gemabs" for those pd
> patches.  If Gem was compiled as single-file-single-class, then this
> would "just work".
> 

since Gem objects do share a lot of code, even splitting Gem into a lot
of separate objects (which is planned on the long term) will still need
a "core" which i would implement as a (very small) Gem.pd_linux


mfgasr
IOhannes




More information about the Pd-list mailing list