[PD] more paths in pd extended
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri May 4 21:46:29 CEST 2007
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> AFAIK it does not work yet - but it should not be that hard to
>> implement ...
>
> That does not work and would be a pain to implement.
why?
>
> I think that there should just be a libdir called "gemabs" for those pd
> patches. If Gem was compiled as single-file-single-class, then this
> would "just work".
>
since Gem objects do share a lot of code, even splitting Gem into a lot
of separate objects (which is planned on the long term) will still need
a "core" which i would implement as a (very small) Gem.pd_linux
mfgasr
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list