[PD] mod~ ???

[Derek Holzer]

I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea is 
to change the start of the loop to any place in the sample. If the 
length of the loop is longer than what's left of the sample in the 
table, currently I get silence. If I use [wrap~] the way you describe 
it, the loop I select always starts at the beginning of the table, 
because [wrap~] returns the percentage of the table I have "overshot".

I need a solution where, if the table is 100 places long, I can loop 
from 95 back around to 25 if need be. Which is what my theoretical 
[mod~] would do. But I simply can't "wrap" my head around how to 
construct it. Your [wrap~] solution seems to return a loop starting at 0 
which is 30 units long instead.

best,
d.

IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Derek Holzer wrote:
>> end of the table)? [wrap~] doesn't do the trick, BTW.
> 
> i am sure it does.
> try scaling the signal before sending it to [wrap~] and afterwards undo
> the scaling.
> 
> 
> [/~ 100]
> |
> [wrap~]
> |
> [*~ 100]
> 
> mfa.sdr
> IOhannes
> 

-- 
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 187:
"Would anybody want it?"