[PD] accuracy of signal/message-objects

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Mon May 7 21:18:39 CEST 2007

On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 20:59 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> martin.peach at sympatico.ca hat gesagt: // martin.peach at sympatico.ca wrote:
> > [metro] is very accurate over time, it just has a jitter as the
> > bangs have to happen in between sample blocks
> What do you mean by this "bangs have to happen in between sample
> blocks"? The bangs from metro AFAIK happen independent from the sample
> blocks.

in order to make this discussion more confusing, i say:
afaik, it depends which object receives the bang from the [metro]. when
it is [vline~] or [vsnapshot~], then it is independent from sample
blocks, but when the receiver is the phase inlet of an oscillator or
[tabwrite~], then the bang happens on the boundaries.
personally, i find that a bit confusing and i would like all these
objects to behave the same, namely independent from sample blocks.

the same two cents again


Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de

More information about the Pd-list mailing list