[PD] pix_multiblob cpu usage

[nosehair911 at bellsouth.net]

I found a great looking set of vision libraries that might work:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vxl/
I dont have any programming skills but I'm going to poke around and see what I can do.  I think that 
anyone with a little bit of C++ skills would be able to wrap the vcsl library within vxl to come up with a 
good computer vision/tracking set of objects.  The question is how cpu efficient it will be?
Alain
> 
> From: <nosehair911 at bellsouth.net>
> Date: 2007/05/15 Tue AM 09:21:34 EDT
> To: Tim Boykett <tim at timesup.org>, "Kyle Klipowicz" <kyleklip at gmail.com>
> CC: Pure Data List <pd-list at iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] pix_multiblob cpu usage
> 
> The buigest problem with opencv (a great option I believe) is that it only works on intell processors, 
so 
> anyone on an amd or a ppc (like me) would be screwed.  If there was something like that for all 
> processors it would be awsome.  I think this kind of computer vision framework is needed in PD, 
> specially concidering how easy an FTIR setup is to build and the possibilities it could open.
> Alain
> > 
> > From: Tim Boykett <tim at timesup.org>
> > Date: 2007/05/15 Tue AM 07:41:45 EDT
> > To: "Kyle Klipowicz" <kyleklip at gmail.com>
> > CC: "Nose Hair" <nosehair911 at bellsouth.net>, 
> >  Pure Data List <pd-list at iem.at>
> > Subject: Re: [PD] pix_multiblob cpu usage
> > 
> > 
> > Of course the "obvious" solution is to port the OpenCV bits and pieces
> > to PD/Gem externals :-) We did some last year for VVVV, using some  
> > existing
> > framework, it worked within one day or so.
> > 
> > There are several vision/video external frameworks out there; are any
> > of them in Gem or elsewhere in PD (pdp, gridflow, etc)?
> > 
> > tim
> > 
> > 
> > On 15/05/2007, at 12:36 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
> > 
> > > On 5/14/07, Nose Hair <nosehair911 at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > >> I tried running it with a low res 400x300 clip and it still did  
> > >> the same
> > >> thing.  I am trying to get a game going using an FTIR setup. Here  
> > >> is a
> > >> reference:
> > >> http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirsense/
> > >
> > > Jeff Han, sweet reference of course.
> > >
> > >> pix_mutiblob is way to slow, I cant get gridflow compiled, and  
> > >> pidip is not
> > >> working currently on the extended version.  Is there another  
> > >> option to do
> > >> functional multitracking on a mac with pure data?  I really cant  
> > >> fork over
> > >> the dough for max/msp/jitter, but there is a free jitter plugin  
> > >> called
> > >> cv.jit that looks great:
> > >> http://www.iamas.ac.jp/~jovan02/cv/
> > >> Is there a posibility that anyone will port this over to PD I wonder?
> > >
> > > I dunno if this will happen or if it is possible to port directly from
> > > Jitter to Pd (maybe Gridflow or PDP/PIDIP?), but I think we could all
> > > benefit with some super DSP-geek "keeping up with the Joneses" on many
> > > fronts!
> > >
> > > ~Kyle
> > > -- 
> > >
> > > http://theradioproject.com
> > > http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
> > >
> > > (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
> > > (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
> > > ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
> > > _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
> > > ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> > > listinfo/pd-list
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>