[PD] Bidirectional Module Problem - dynamically changing delwrite?
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue May 15 17:40:18 CEST 2007
Kim Taylor wrote:
> So I am stuck. Is there any way I can dynamically create/set a
> delwrite~? It seems to be the only function that might work in this
no, you cannot dynamically change the [delwrite~] name, because
[delwrite~] is the object that actually holds the delay line.
all the [delread~]s and [vd~]s out there will depend on the existence of
a named [delwrite~].
this is much the same as with [catch~]/[throw~] and [send~]/[receive~],
so it follows the same logic: the object that would break everything
when missing, cannot be made missing.
pd does not impose much, but it tends to not allow you to create invalid
> case, and all that I need to do is change the destination.
> Or can anyone see another way i could realise the structure shown in the image?
if you really want a settable [delwrite~], why don't you just use
> Alternatively, is this something that can be done with externals? I
not if you prefer no segfaults.
More information about the Pd-list