[PD] puredata evolution

[Kyle Klipowicz]

Very nice dream indeed! Thanks for sharing, that would be a great
future. I really am seeing game development being the new film in
terms of art and entertainment.

~Kyle

On 5/26/07, Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote:
>
> The little dog in the picture is saying "woof..woof..  your card stacking
> method is suboptimally stable...woof"
>
> > do you think that gem is a mature proyect for video creation? why not? why
> > the evolution is slow? or simply why there are not a  object for to save
> > pretty videos in open formats? (same asks for pdp).
>
> Pd has grown big, sound, video, physical robotics,
> installations, with Pd as a general purpose cyberjunction. Big must
> move at a fairly slow pace to stay coherent.
>
> > Which is the next future of PureData
>
> As a crazy hypothetical, hmmm, I wish for Blender to marry Puredata as their
> games sound engine and make set of [world] objects babies...
> ..that have hooks called from game object events.:) When you see a video link
> on a viewer in game Pd is handling all that, when two objects collide
> the sound you get is Pd handling it... Pd as an embedded realtime signals and
> interfacing layer in a games engine sort of thing. /end dream~~
>
> > Maybe the extended version is a valuable effort for to have a open platform
> > for creatives. Then which is the sense of desiredata? (
> > https://devel.goto10.org/desiredata)
>
> Its way open yeah and such is its charm, a great dev environment for
> so many ideas, not necessarily a final component or end in
> iteself yet, for me. Beyond prototyping in Pd and rebuilding by
> hand I'd like to see Pd output more reusable code and integrate
> with other things as well as itself on a lower level. Like being
> able to compile new externals from inside Pd itself (segfault
> proof combo of compiler, text editor and "active object"), or converting
> the DSP parts of a patch to a plugin for another system LV2 or
> VST or something not requiring Pd any longer. So in summary I'd
> like to see Pd mature as a component in a wider development
> environment, which I think it surely will.
>
>
> ANdy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:28:05 +0200
> "victor " <vdaigu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I love pd :) but after many years from its creation, why some times it
> > seem a casd's castle?
> > http://teacher.scholastic.com/max/castle/img/cardcast.jpg
> >
> > After to read in that list the tipical question "pix_video don't work". I'm
> > thinking about pd
> >
> > do you think that gem is a mature proyect for video creation? why not? why
> > the evolution is slow? or simply why there are not a  object for to save
> > pretty videos in open formats? (same asks for pdp).
> >
> > Maybe the extended version is a valuable effort for to have a open platform
> > for creatives. Then which is the sense of desiredata? (
> > https://devel.goto10.org/desiredata)
> >
> > summarizing: Which is the next future of PureData
> >
> > thanks
> >
>
>
> --
> Use the source
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>


-- 
-----
------------
    ----     -----
---- -------- - ------
http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com