[PD] proposals for src/notes.txt

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Mon May 28 22:13:15 CEST 2007

On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 20:30 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > i hoped, that i can get rid of the startup options with [declare], so
> > that pd doesn't need additional flags for running netpd. but this means,
> > that it is not possible (or i need to add a [declare] in every patch and
> > every abs, which is a bit awkward).
> Recursive declares could be a problem, if you'd use an abstraction,
> that in turn needs a different declare, possibly with a nameclash.
> Say you'd want to use Cyclone's counter and "declare -lib cyclone". An
> abstraction you use may want to use cxc's counter. With recursive
> declares, this could generate a nameclash in that abstraction. 
> A way out would be a hierarchical system for declares, but that's even
> farther.
> Ciao

hm, it's not that i wanted to use [declare]'s inside abstractions and it
turned out, that it is not necessary at all (at least for what i want).
but every patch needs a [declare -path], whereas only one (the first
loaded) patch needs a [declare -lib]. i find that inconsistent.


Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de

More information about the Pd-list mailing list