[PD] future directions for threading in Pd (Was: Re: puredata evolution)
pkstone at ucdavis.edu
Wed May 30 23:27:37 CEST 2007
Sorry to sound so enthusiastic! I know it was brainstorming, but I'm
just happy to hear people thinking about the same things, especially to
think that it's even possible...someday.
Good luck with DesireData. I miss your presence on the PD list.
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Phil Stone wrote:
>> And now to hear it's being thought about in DD...this is so cool! I
>> really hope it can happen. Please keep us posted on any developments.
> When I had this discussion I had GridFlow in mind, not DesireData, but
> I always think about how one idea connects to the rest of what exists,
> so I always think of possible future expansion. Features of GridFlow
> that need not be specific to GridFlow, are usually designed to make
> sense for pd at large, even if those features are still only bundled
> with GridFlow. Generally, GridFlow is closer to the concepts that are
> in Pd itself, than other video plugins are.
> DesireData has been almost on hold since sometime in January. My plan
> is to resume working on it this week and finish what I already
> started. This certainly won't include threads.
> I don't even think that a threaded GridFlow is for 2007.
> Brainstorming is not a promise of software and a promise of software
> is not software.
> (note that even though I post this I have no idea what's been on
> pd-list since March and I don't expect to read pd-list anytime soon)
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list