[PD] Welcome to the 90s
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Mon Jun 11 01:48:58 CEST 2007
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Martin Peach wrote:
> I don't know what hardware manufacturers are using these days but I
> would suspect embedded PCs are the best way to go with totally digital
> synthesis. There should be no reason not to use OSC except that it isn't
> a proprietary standard so there's no money to be made with it...and
> who's going to be the first to put an ethernet port in their machine.
OSC doesn't need Ethernet. It doesn't even need UDP, even though most
implementations only implement a UDP transport. Frankly, I don't know why
you shouldn't use OSC-over-serial with DB9 if that's cheaper. Else perhaps
OSC-over-serial-over-USB in low-speed mode.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list