[PD] [dsplib]: how should it be maintained?
Roman Haefeli
reduzierer at yahoo.de
Tue Jun 19 21:45:33 CEST 2007
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:33 +0200, Steffen wrote:
> The "x.x.x"-system might be nice. How do you use it? Keep the first
> x=0 at all times as no code gets to version 1; bumb the second x when
> new features are added; bumb the last x when bugs are corrected? -
yo, that is how i use them. but the main reason, why netpd uses it, is a
purely technical one:
patches and abstractions are shared between netpd clients. in order to
make sure, that changes made to a patch or abstraction get to the other
netpd clients as well, this versioning system was introduced. when
loading a patch with creator, the version is checked by creator and
compared with the version of the same patch on the other clients. if the
patch to be opened has a higher version number than the on the other
clients, the patch is uploaded instead of only opened, so that the patch
on the other clients is overwritten.
> Such info one how the version numbers makes sense is nice to add in a
> README, i think.
hm, since - as frank stated - a version number is not essential, i'd
say, it wouldn't do it into the readme.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list