[PD] [dsplib]: how should it be maintained?

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Tue Jun 19 21:45:33 CEST 2007


On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:33 +0200, Steffen wrote:

> The "x.x.x"-system might be nice. How do you use it? Keep the first  
> x=0 at all times as no code gets to version 1; bumb the second x when  
> new features are added; bumb the last x when bugs are corrected? - 

yo, that is how i use them. but the main reason, why netpd uses it, is a
purely technical one: 
patches and abstractions are shared between netpd clients. in order to
make sure, that changes made to a patch or abstraction get to the other
netpd clients as well, this versioning system was introduced. when
loading a patch with creator, the version is checked by creator and
compared with the version of the same patch on the other clients. if the
patch to be opened has a higher version number than the on the other
clients, the patch is uploaded instead of only opened, so that the patch
on the other clients is overwritten.
  
> Such info one how the version numbers makes sense is nice to add in a  
> README, i think.

hm, since - as frank stated - a version number is not essential, i'd
say, it wouldn't do it into the readme.

roman


		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de





More information about the Pd-list mailing list