[PD] Any relation between pidip and Gem??

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Yves Degoyon wrote:
> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>
>> it seems like pidip is searching for libquicktime at the wrong place
>> (where it cannot find it); Gem seems to find it, so pidip can re-use the
>> bindings made available for Gem.
>>
>>   
> err, sorry, pidip is not even searching for quicktime,
> for habitually it's linked and loaded with pdp..
> 
> so "pidip is searching for libquicktime at the wrong place"
> is _again_ an abuse.. if you don't know, just ask...

ok, now i do ask: who has abused? who (or what?) has been abused? when
has this one been abused before?

anyhow, even though i don't know anything about it, i keep on brabbling:
javi, it seems that your pdp has been compiled without quicktime support
(or against another version of quicktime, which is not available on your
computer), but pidip (watch out!) relies on pdp providing quicktime
bindings.
try "ldd pdp.pd_linux | grep libquicktime" (in the correct path, or
course), and see what it tells you.
if it doesn't find anything, then pdp lacks quicktime support; if it
refers to an unkown location, you might be able to fix it by symlinking
(and/or modifying your /etc/ld.so.conf)


and to answer your subject-line:
as can be easily seen, the relation between pidip and Gem is of deep
love and ab/musement.


mfga-sdr
IOhannes