[PD] Any relation between pidip and Gem??

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

hi

Yves Degoyon wrote:
> hola,
> 
>>>
>>> "pidip is searching for libquicktime at the wrong place"
>>>   

you should read the entire sentence in my original mail.
it said "it seems like pidip is searching for libquicktime at the wrong
place", which - to my limited knowledge of the english language -
expresses an uncertainty about the information on my side (just to
stress it: the important part is the "it seems")

> is an affirmation, unjustified and not founded at all,

i believe, that expressing uncertainty is _not_ an affirmation.


> that's where the abuse is, unverified information.

this is an interesting definition of "abuse".
after a bit of research it seems (sic!) like you are referring to
something along the lines of the "verbal abuse" article at wikipedia[1].
all in all i am not entirely sure, who is the abused one.

what i believe is true, however, is that we both belong to the group of
people who "engage in fierce argument, validating the hostility by
mirroring it." [1]



> 
> and now something totally different :
> what's the status of the moonlibs
> http://www.moonix.freesurf.fr/ ?
> did a. rousseau gave up pd?
> is it included in pd.-extended? in cvs?

not to my knowledge (brabbling again...), but since you have write
access to the pd-cvs, you could just add it (the license seems(!) to be
LGPL, but i have checked only a random sample; probably it would be good
to contact a. rousseau before doing so)


mfg.asdr
IOhannes


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verbal_abuse