[PD] dropout save metro

Patco megalegoland at yahoo.fr
Sun Jun 24 18:16:21 CEST 2007

Roman Haefeli a écrit :
> On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 06:59 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Enrique Erne wrote:
>>> On Jun 22, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>>>> lets assume you want to schedule the next 'bang' to 43s297ms, but
>>>> the output of [timer] maybe is '43 296', '43 296', '43 298'.
>>>> won't be hit at all. then i think, that this approach wouldn't be 
>>>> accurate at all, since there is no logical time involved. the advantage 
>>>> of logical time is,
>>> i think your totally right... too bad.
>> Then both of you need to read the helpfile of [timer] and compare it with 
>> the one of [realtime]: [timer] works in logical time only.
> oops, i meant to talk about a solution based on zexy's [time], not on
> [timer] (typo). however, since there is [realtime], it wouldn't make
> much sense to use [timer]. you could reach the same with both.
> roman
following the doc it is clear that there is a big difference between 
[timer] and [realtime], I don't understand what is the meaning of 'same 
with both' in your sentence.
 If the 'universal space-time continuum' model makes sense, only the 
acceleration of motion between the computers running the Real Time 
metronome could shift the counting.

More information about the Pd-list mailing list