[PD] pdmtl abstractions questions and comments

Thomas O Fredericks tof at danslchamp.org
Mon Jul 2 20:26:52 CEST 2007

> I vote for no namespace, no prefix, it's difficult enough to organize
> files for pd, and many prefixes won't work with externals that requires
> a script, for example
> if I put my python scripts into extra/python, I'd call the script with
> [pyext] with a namespace like that [py python/myscript myclass] but
> obviously it won't work, in fact I'd have to start pd with -path python
> or put the script into the patch's folder and put no namespace for the
> script file reconized, same thing with tcl scripts, etc...
>  I'd add that a good taxonomy should take into account any pd and
> external related files.

Using no namespace, no preffix is what started this whole mess.


More information about the Pd-list mailing list