[PD] [PD-announce] the end of type restrictions
matju at artengine.ca
Sun Jul 22 23:12:31 CEST 2007
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Miller Puckette wrote:
> It's lame, but the idea behind the original design of "pack/unpack"
> was to have the argument lists look the same. So, to send a variety
> of (known-type) data down a send/receive channel or whatnot, one could
> use "pack tea for 2" and a corresponding "unpack tea for 2".
error: pack: tea: bad type
could you please use an example that actually does not cause an error in
your own pd?
There's no way to use "tea" and "for" as being default values in that
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list