[PD] [PD-announce] the end of type restrictions

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Miller Puckette wrote:

> It's lame, but the idea behind the original design of "pack/unpack"
> was to have the argument lists look the same.  So, to send a variety
> of (known-type) data down a send/receive channel or whatnot, one could
> use "pack tea for 2" and a corresponding "unpack tea for 2".

error: pack: tea: bad type

could you please use an example that actually does not cause an error in 
your own pd?

There's no way to use "tea" and "for" as being default values in that 
context.

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada