[PD] [PD-announce] the end of type restrictions
mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Mon Jul 23 03:04:09 CEST 2007
Sure enough... It does not work in Pd. I checked and it still worked in
Max/FTS vintage 1993, so it's Pd at fault :)
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:12:31PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Miller Puckette wrote:
> >It's lame, but the idea behind the original design of "pack/unpack"
> >was to have the argument lists look the same. So, to send a variety
> >of (known-type) data down a send/receive channel or whatnot, one could
> >use "pack tea for 2" and a corresponding "unpack tea for 2".
> error: pack: tea: bad type
> could you please use an example that actually does not cause an error in
> your own pd?
> There's no way to use "tea" and "for" as being default values in that
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801, Montr?al QC Canada
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list