[PD] difference send and using msg with ";"
gr at grrrr.org
Thu Aug 16 19:20:05 CEST 2007
True - i could never understand why this isn't the case. But i
remember that there have been related discussions on the list months
or years ago
Am 16.08.2007 um 19:10 schrieb marius schebella:
> it is a pity that there is no $0 in messages. that would help so much!
> most of the time I use local send/receive like s $0-blabla. with
> messages you always have to mess with workaounds to achieve the
> same result.
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> i don't know if there is a technical difference in efficiency, but
>> is a difference in use. at least before 0.40, using [; $1 $2( was the
>> only way to achieve a settable send.
>> there is also a cosmetic aspect: if you want to collect some initial
>> values together at some place, it is much nicer to have only one
>> box, where all values can be stored instead of having a
>> [s value]
>> construction for each value.
>> |; /
>> |value 34 |
>> |somevalue 127 |
>> |othervalue 57 |
>> |yoyo 1___________\
>> looks much nicer and is easier to edit, isn't it?
>> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:36 -0400, marius schebella wrote:
>>> when I look through miller's tutorial patches, I often find ";-
>>> instead of a send object like:
>>> [;detune $1(
>>> [s detune]
>>> I wonder why, is there a significant difference? is one more
>>> then the other (if yes, I always thought send is more efficient..?).
>>> this is not urgent, I can sleep without an answer! just curious.
>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>> Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
More information about the Pd-list