[PD] difference send and using msg with ";"

marius schebella marius.schebella at gmail.com
Fri Aug 17 18:59:37 CEST 2007


Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, marius schebella wrote:
>> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>> reason. But as Marius' and others' suggestion of changing $ in
>>> messages to #
>> no, I was talking about changing the sign for creation arguments!
>> for reasons of backwards compatibitily.
> 
> For reasons of backwards compatibility you'd keep $- the same because if 
> you write $- it currently stays $- ... if you are going to selectively 
> drop compatibility, you ought to explain why and how, e.g. "because $- 
> is rarer than #" ...

in old patches you have
$1 $2 $3 in messages
and $0 $1 $2 in objects
presumtion: you don't just simply want to add $0-feature to messages 
simply because it would be inconsequent, or difficult to understand for 
newbies...
therefor you want to differentiate between creation and message 
arguments. giving one of them a new appearance, but still making old 
patches work.
case 1 (bad):
you have
$0 $1 #1 $2 #2 $3 #3 in messages
and $0 $1 $2 $3 in objects.
(that's bad because, then u still have the confusion of $0 and $- in 
messages, exactly what you did not want
case 2 (better):
you have
#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 $1 $2 $3 $4 in messages (all meaning different things)
and $0 or #0, $1 or #1, $2 or #2 in objects. (#- the new style, but for 
backwards compatibilty still allowing the old $- style)
hope this is clear enough.
marius.




More information about the Pd-list mailing list