[PD] SMP Questions
tim at klingt.org
Wed Aug 22 10:36:10 CEST 2007
> That's too bad. I'll take your word for it that jackdmp wouldn't be
> able to manage the inter-process connection in a scalable way -- I'm not
> familiar with how it works. I'm disappointed, because it sounded like a
> cheap (and yes, slightly inconvenient -- but better than nothing) way to
> scale up PD with SMP.
if you can split your pd patches to a small number of instances (say
10), you'd probably have some benefit ... running 50 instances of pd is
probably not a good idea ...
tim at klingt.org ICQ: 96771783
The price an artist pays for doing what he wants is that he has to do
William S. Burroughs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Pd-list