[PD] SMP Questions

Tim Blechmann tim at klingt.org
Wed Aug 22 10:36:10 CEST 2007

> That's too bad.  I'll take your word for it that jackdmp wouldn't be 
> able to manage the inter-process connection in a scalable way -- I'm not 
> familiar with how it works.  I'm disappointed, because it sounded like a 
> cheap (and yes, slightly inconvenient -- but better than nothing) way to 
> scale up PD with SMP.

if you can split your pd patches to a small number of instances (say
10), you'd probably have some benefit ... running 50 instances of pd is
probably not a good idea ... 

cheers, tim

tim at klingt.org    ICQ: 96771783

The price an artist pays for doing what he wants is that he has to do
  William S. Burroughs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070822/aadd27d5/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list