[PD] select backward compatibility

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Wed Sep 5 17:22:51 CEST 2007


On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> Hallo,
> Patrice Colet hat gesagt: // Patrice Colet wrote:
>
>>  Hello, I've updated on some computer pd-0.37 to 0.40, and passed  
>> a lot
>> of time to find out an error caused by [select], attached is the  
>> mistake
>>  I've found out in my old, huge, and ugly patch.
>>  With simple words, could you people make something with error  
>> messages
>> to not wasting hours of debbugging,
>> many thanks in advance for any effort in that way, :).
>
> You can only sent a float to the right inlet of a [select] initialized
> in float-mode ([select]s, that don't have a symbol as argument, are in
> float-mode). Sending a bang into the second inlet instead is an error.
> I admit that it's a bit strange, that a naked "bang" message gives a
> different error message (no method for "bang") than a bang sent
> through [t a] (no method for "list"), but otherwise the error message
> here is quite clear, isn't it? Empty lists are equivalent to bang.

Sounds like a bug to me, please submit it to the bug tracker

http://puredata.org/dev/bugtracker

.hc

>
> Ciao
> -- 
>  Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list




------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,  
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better  
language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne






More information about the Pd-list mailing list