[PD] pddp drafts

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:59 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> hard off wrote:
>>> i got it!
>>>
>>> a settable send using only pd vanilla objects.
>> why don't you just use [send] instead of [setsend]?
>> i don't see any added functionality in this abstraction (but an added 
>> dependency on the abstraction)
> 
> are you reading the list?

yes i am.

> 
> it's about to overcome the problem, that the settable [send] is an only
>> =0.40 feature.

i am not talking about using the new (set) feature of [send], but about 
replacing [setsend] with [send].

have you had a look at [setsend]?


[inlet]
|
[send $1]

which is a wrapper for [send]: it has the very same functionality (in 
any version of pd)


fmadsr.
IOhannes