[PD] settable send (pd 0.40+)

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> that is: if your create a [send] object without(!) a send-name, it will 
> have a second inlet which can be used to set the send-name.

Which reminds me: Why was it made so that only sends without argument
get the second inlet? I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to have
every send have a second inlet to set the receiver. It's easy to
achieve with an abstraction (as attached) but that seems unnecessary
work to me.

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ssend-help.pd
Type: application/puredata
Size: 432 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070918/e1a95a66/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ssend.pd
Type: application/puredata
Size: 222 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070918/e1a95a66/attachment-0001.bin>