[PD] Bug in lister (zexy) ?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> - [list append] is _not_ exactly the same as [lister]. you can make a 
> [lister] (or [l]) _abstraction_ with built-in objects:
> 
> |                   |
> [route bang]        |
> |          |        |
> |          [t b a]  |
> +----------+     |  |
> |                +--+
> [list append     ]
> |
> 
> 
> - afaik, this patchlet is 100% compatible, if you feed all the arguments 
> of [lister] to the [list append] replacement.
> 
> 
> - this patchlet cannot be made into a 100% compatible _abstraction_ with 


what i mean is: you can replace [l] with the above code. but you cannot 
simply make an abstraction [l] containing the above code and expect it 
to behave identically.


fgmad.r
IOhannes