[PD] gem problem

[chris clepper]

I tested your patch here on an Intel Mac and it works like I think it should
work.  Two of the layers are partially transparent based on the individual R
G and B values.  Can you post a screen capture of the working and
non-working output?

On 10/8/07, Oded Ben-Tal <oded at ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I am finding that gem is doing things very differently in two versions.
> The
> attached patch is slightly simplified from what I am running but the
> essence
> is running 3 versions of the same movie on 3 'screens' using
> [pix_threshold]
> and [pix_alpha] to selectively hide elements of the pictures at the front.
> This works fine when I use pd-extended0.38 When I try it with
> pd-extended0.39 (from http://at.or.at/hans/pd/installers.html ) it doesn't
> work. The pictures on the front 'screens' are all turned blueish but the
> selections aren't removed.
> I am running this on an intel Mac OSX10.4
> I would be happy to stick with 0.38 but other things aren't working
> correctly
> with it, and I can't even run two versions in parallel because hans'
> version
> handles libraries internally, and gets confused when there is a preference
> file like the older version wants :(
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
> Oded
>
> ___________________________________________________
> Oded Ben-Tal
> http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~oded
> oded at ccrma.stanford.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20071010/fbed19ce/attachment.htm>