[PD] [pd] upsampled readsf~

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Sat Nov 17 00:16:02 CET 2007


On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 21:14 +0100, zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:
> Quoting Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de>:
> 
> > afaik, [readsf~] is 'stupid' and will always read in the environment's
> > sampling rate. in order to read faster, put [readsf~] in a subpatch
> > together with a [block~ 1 1 64], so that it reads 64 times quicker than
> > at standard sampling rate.
> 
> i suggest to use a block-size larger than "1" to get a decent caching  
> and not spend so much time doing meta-work instead of moving data.
> 
> [block~ 1024 1 64]

oops, yes.. i actually wanted to write [block~ 64 1 64], but yeah, using
a blocksize of 1024 is even better.

roman



		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de





More information about the Pd-list mailing list