[PD] loadbang feature request

Frank Barknecht fbar at footils.org
Tue Nov 20 22:24:11 CET 2007


Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:

> there was a discussion 3 years ago about the inlet of loadbang. I see 
> now that loadbang has lost its inlet, but actually it would be nice to 
> have it back and to make it react to a bang message. 3 years ago frank 
> and IOhannes said, they would vote for this feature too.
> I think this feature is helpful, when you edit a patch and want to 
> retrigger the loadbang.
> I know that this can also be done by a message
> ;pd-patchname.pd loadbang
> but that is not so intuitive and also more time-consuming to write. and 
> also for max compatibility...

Ah, does Max have an inlet in [loadbang]? 

Anyway another workaround is to use an abstraction: 

 [inlet]
 |
 | [loadbang]
 |/
 [outlet]

You could even put a [receive $1] inside.

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__




More information about the Pd-list mailing list