[PD] loadbang feature request
Frank Barknecht
fbar at footils.org
Tue Nov 20 22:24:11 CET 2007
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> there was a discussion 3 years ago about the inlet of loadbang. I see
> now that loadbang has lost its inlet, but actually it would be nice to
> have it back and to make it react to a bang message. 3 years ago frank
> and IOhannes said, they would vote for this feature too.
> I think this feature is helpful, when you edit a patch and want to
> retrigger the loadbang.
> I know that this can also be done by a message
> ;pd-patchname.pd loadbang
> but that is not so intuitive and also more time-consuming to write. and
> also for max compatibility...
Ah, does Max have an inlet in [loadbang]?
Anyway another workaround is to use an abstraction:
[inlet]
|
| [loadbang]
|/
[outlet]
You could even put a [receive $1] inside.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list