[PD] loadbang feature request

[Olivier Heinry]

Le mardi 20 novembre 2007 à 22:24 +0100, Frank Barknecht a écrit :
> Hallo,
> marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> 
> > there was a discussion 3 years ago about the inlet of loadbang. I see 
> > now that loadbang has lost its inlet, but actually it would be nice to 
> > have it back and to make it react to a bang message. 3 years ago frank 
> > and IOhannes said, they would vote for this feature too.
> > I think this feature is helpful, when you edit a patch and want to 
> > retrigger the loadbang.
> > I know that this can also be done by a message
> > ;pd-patchname.pd loadbang
> > but that is not so intuitive and also more time-consuming to write. and 
> > also for max compatibility...
> 
> Ah, does Max have an inlet in [loadbang]? 
> 
> Anyway another workaround is to use an abstraction: 
> 
>  [inlet]
>  |
>  | [loadbang]
>  |/
>  [outlet]
> 
> You could even put a [receive $1] inside.


You could even use the init.lb abstraction of pdmtl, which has plenty of
init.* ...

++
O.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20071120/ff8def80/attachment.pgp>