[PD] fft beginner question
cristiano figueirÿfffff3
figocris at yahoo.com.br
Wed Nov 21 16:28:28 CET 2007
Hi, thanks for help everyone. Now it's much more
clear. I downloaded the "Beginner's Guide to the
FFT-objects in Pd" from Frank
(http://footils.org/pkg/fft-tut.tgz). And have some
more questions:
-> working on patch fft-up-close.pd:
I have a blocksize=8 and a samplerate=44100 and all
analysis have been printed here:
orig:
0.13004 0.26951 0.40352 0.52934 0.64446 0.74649
0.83341 0.90344
img:
0 1.0317 0.41678 0.17191 0 0
0 0
re:
4.4602 -0.58717 -0.46243 -0.44167 -0.43735 0
0 0
amp:
4.4602 1.1871 0.62253 0.47395 0.43735 0
0 0
amp-normal:
0.27876 0.074192 0.038908 0.029622 0.027334 0
0 0
after-fft:
0.13004 0.26951 0.40352 0.52934 0.64446 0.74649
0.83341 0.90344
=> Ok, with a block of 8 i have data control over 4
partials from the incoming signal rigth? The
frequencies are given by multiples of
Samplerate/blocksize, starting on F0= 0hz , that's
rigth?
So, my question is about the normalized
amplitudes(amp-normal):
1) Why the first is so loud? This is not the F0 (0
hz)?
2) With the normalized amplitudes i can estimate wich
partials are more relevants to the resynthesis (wich
partials are more louder in a particular
spectrum/audio)? Is this rigth?
-> working on "specgate~.pd"
1) My Pd (vanilla 0-40.2, on debian) don't recognize
the [>~] object, isn't a native object? Case not where
i download this object?
thanks for all.
cristiano
Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!
http://br.mail.yahoo.com/
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list