[PD] osx universal binaries for externals ?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Tue Nov 27 17:02:02 CET 2007
On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:34 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:43 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>>
>>> .pd_darwin is still supported for legacy externals.
>>>
>> Pd-extended only builds objects using .pd_darwin as an extension.
>> It works fine for i386, PowerPC, and universal binaries.
>
> but then, pd-extended _is_ a legacy project (no harm intended from
> my side; there is nothing wrong with that)
>
> once Pd-extended grows to 0.41, chances are high that it will
> support the .d_fat idiom too.
> in the meantime, we can argue whether it was a good idea to have
> different suffixes for different OS's _and_ architectures (but why
> should we?)
Actually, Pd-extended will stick to .pd_darwin as the default unless
someone else really wants to change it. .d_fat was introducted in
0.40, and the current Pd-extended still uses .pd_darwin.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list