[PD] osx universal binaries for externals ?

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Tue Nov 27 17:02:02 CET 2007

On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:34 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:43 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> .pd_darwin is still supported for legacy externals.
>> Pd-extended only builds objects using .pd_darwin as an extension.   
>> It  works fine for i386, PowerPC, and universal binaries.
> but then, pd-extended _is_ a legacy project (no harm intended from  
> my side; there is nothing wrong with that)
> once Pd-extended grows to 0.41, chances are high that it will  
> support the .d_fat idiom too.
> in the meantime, we can argue whether it was a good idea to have  
> different suffixes for different OS's _and_ architectures (but why  
> should we?)

Actually, Pd-extended will stick to .pd_darwin as the default unless  
someone else really wants to change it.  .d_fat was introducted in  
0.40, and the current Pd-extended still uses .pd_darwin.



Access to computers should be unlimited and total.  - the hacker ethic

More information about the Pd-list mailing list