[PD] select issues
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Thu Nov 29 18:55:30 CET 2007
On Nov 29, 2007, at 12:46 PM, marius schebella wrote:
> I think [select] always worked that way since the beginning of Pd.
> it is also the case in max. I don't know if it is a good idea to
> change the behaviour, since it is easy to find a work around and
> might brake patches.
If someone is relying on [select] to trim lists, that would be either
unintentional, or some odd programming, IMHO. I think it's worth
it. There have been more severe changes in the past, like atan
switching inlets, there could be a warning like "warning passing data
thru unchanged, this is new behavior in 0.41".
> but personally, of course I would like to see the change, at least
> it needs to be documented. it probably was documented in the
> original helpfile, but it is not documented in the pddp help patch.
Please add it to PDDP help patch and submit it to the tracker. Then
I can check it in.
> is there a workflow for changes in helppatches. how do I submit
> changes.
> and a wish related to that topic: please keep/make helpfiles read/
> writeable!
chmod -R +w /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/doc/
.hc
> marius.
>
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Hmm, I suppose it should pass thru every thing unmodified on the
>> right outlet. Can anyone think of any problems or disadvantages
>> of [select] just outputting the unmatched input intact on the
>> right outlet?
>> .hc
>> On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:12 AM, marius schebella wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> I just found out, that [select] only throughputs floats and
>>> symbols, but
>>> not lists.
>>>
>>> [1 2 3 4 5(
>>> |
>>> [sel bla]
>>>
>>> will only output "1" on the right outlet, but not a the whole
>>> list. that
>>> is quite a limitation. but... ok.
>>> marius.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>>> listinfo/pd-list
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------- 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she
>> said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish
>> out another pink-collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by
>> Mohja Kahf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list