[PD] VOSIM with a tiny bug

[Andre Schmidt]

is this just me, or why are Andys emails always in the future ?
my date is atm: Tue Dec 11 19:03:36 CET 2007

.andre



On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 04:21 +0000, Andy Farnell wrote:
> Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
> 
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:07:17 +0100
> Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > attached is some stretched  phasor~ fun for your classic synthesis
> > methods class: an implementation of the VOSIM algorithm for speech
> > synthesis etc. as invented by Kaegi/Templaars. 
> > 
> > My implementation is almost correct, but has a slight bug, which you
> > can see if you set M and T to the values indicated by message boxes,
> > set N to 2 or 3 and and set b to be larger than 0. Then the step
> > function which scales the amplitude of the sin^2 pulses starts
> > irregularily. I'm quite sure this comes from the way I use [samphold~]
> > inside [vosim~] as it sometimes samples the wrong value. However I
> > don't yet know of a proper workaround. (One workaround would be to
> > just omit the samhold-step, but the result would not be VOSIM
> > according to the textbooks.)
> > 
> > So anybody with a good idea? 
> > 
> > Ciao
> > -- 
> >  Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__
> > 
> 
>