[PD] performance question: connections versus sends

[Andy Farnell]

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:57:23 +0100
zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:

> Quoting Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>:
> >> Thankyou Frank. Remember we talked about problems that happen
> >> using more than one [r~]. Was that to do with creation order?
> >> Or is that something that only affects [throw~][catch~] pairs?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Maybe it was just me misusing [s~], if you create more than
> > one [s~] with the same argument then only the last one created
> > works.



Yes, I understand that Iohannes, the remark is about the behaviour
you get if you don't understand and misuse [s~][r~]. It surprised
me that it accepted the instance and replaced the old one.

cheers,

Andy


> >
> 
> that is what "one-to-many" means: exactly one(1) [send~] and  
> many(many) [receive~] objects.
> 
> mfg.asd
> IOhannes
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


-- 
Use the source