[PD] Pd + asterisk?
lists at proquariat.de
Thu Dec 27 21:33:38 CET 2007
app_jack doesn't compile...
[CC] app_jack.c -> app_jack.o
app_jack.c: In function â€˜handle_inputâ€™:
app_jack.c:221: error: â€˜FLT_MAXâ€™ undeclared (first use in this function)
app_jack.c:221: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
app_jack.c:221: error: for each function it appears in.)
app_jack.c: In function â€˜queue_voice_frameâ€™:
app_jack.c:411: error: â€˜FLT_MAXâ€™ undeclared (first use in this function)
make: *** [app_jack.o] Error 1
Russell Bryant schrieb:
> Chris wrote:
>> I tried it first with 48KHz and only got noise
> I'm surprised it didn't just crash, actually. :)
> I have made a lot of fixes to the resampling code. I think it works now, but
> haven't been able to test since my last set of changes.
>> A really long delay, but that may was because of my setup... (ISDN <->
>> Asterisk <-> IAX over Wlan <-> Asterisk with Jack) ;)
> Ha, yes, there is a little bit of noticeable delay in that setup ...
>> Pd patch was a really simple [adc~ 1] for audio input from the first
>> jack-channel, a [osc~ 440] for testing and a [dac~ 1] for audio output
>> to the first jack-channel
>> When I connected the osc~ with the dac~ I heard nothing at my phone,
>> when I connected the adc~ from asterisk to a dac~ patched to alsa I
>> neither heard a thing from the phone.
> Oh, alright. That makes sense...
>> I don't know if you can patch two jack-channels together in pd, telling
>> app_jack to connect it's channel to a specific pd-channel would be
>> really easy, but having Pd handling it would be more flexible. Anyway,
>> sending something to pd, that there's a new caller definitely is a good
>> idea for various reasons.
> Thanks for the feedback. Adding a feature to app_jack such that you can not
> just create the ports, but have them connected to some other jack ports sounds
> like a reasonable feature to add. Like you said, having more control over
> connecting jack ports via Pd sounds more flexible, but that will take me some
> more time to figure out. :)
> Thanks again for the feedback. It is very much appreciated.
More information about the Pd-list