[PD] [pool] binary for Mac Intel?

[Luke Iannini (pd)]

This seems like a good time to ask... Thomas, did you ever get a
chance to check out the buffer overrun bug in [pool] discussed here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1818163&group_id=55736&atid=478070
?

I had a look at the source, and perhaps with a little more headbanging
(I've never touched C++) I can fix it myself but I'd imagine you can
do it much faster : )

I don't mean to nag, but I have a really cool update to Memento that
adds [commun]-exposed parameter listing for midi-controller assignment
to any Memento-enabled abstraction.  The overrun means it kills Pd
though (with any nominal level of parameters), so I had to stop
development : (.

For [polywavesynth], for example, you could, in two clicks, assign
knob 7 of your UC-88 or what-have-you to
/polywavesynth1/filter-cutoff, with correct scaling from 0-127 to
20-20000.

And if Novation ever manages to release the SDK for the RemoteSL, I'll
be adding automatic display of parameter names on the RemoteSL's LCD
screens upon assignment...

Cheers
Luke

On Jan 2, 2008 7:28 AM, Phil Stone <pkstone at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> I don't mean to slight [sssad] in any way; it's worked wonderfully for
> [polywavesynth].  Memento looks to integrate much better with OSC (which
> I'm already using in [polywavesynth], and more importantly, will make
> hierarchical saving more manageable.  So, I call it "up" because of some
> increased functionality.
>
> Phil
>
>
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
> >
> >
> >> For instance, I'd like to upgrade my [polywavesynth]'s
> >> state-saving from sssad to Memento
> >>
> >
> > That's not an upgrade, it's a sidegrade.
> >
> > Ciao
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>