Miller Puckette mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Sat Jan 5 19:58:27 CET 2008

Well, portaudio was unavoidable (it's the only patch to coreaudio on Mac and
ASIO on Windows.)  But that doesnt' make a good reason to add yet others.

And yes, I think FUDI is much better than OSC, thank you :)

On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:48:29PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Miller Puckette wrote:
> >I'm still thinking about it.  On the plus side, it would make Pd users' 
> >lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence 
> >and thus reduce Pd's portability.
> Oh yeah. And what do you think you're doing with PortAudio? I don't see Pd 
> depending on an external PortAudio library. Where's the portability 
> problem?
> >The OSC design is not much better than that of MIDI, in my opinion... 
> >it's a pity it's so widely adopted.
> Do you mean that FUDI is so much better? How so?
>  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801, Montr?al QC Canada

> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

More information about the Pd-list mailing list