[PD] counter + list of objects
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Mon Jan 14 18:45:48 CET 2008
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:15:09 +0100
Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:
> marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> > Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > > Morale of story: In my belief, abstraction collections that (as
> > > default) only rely on core objects make life much easier for just
> > > about everyone, beginners and advanced users.
> > you are right. but then you still have the problem that the abstraction
> > collections are not shipped with core pd. so what exactly is the
> > advantage in terms of compatibility? your patch would still be useless
> > without the missing abstraction objects.
> True, but I could bundle the abstractions with the patch easily, as
> nothing needs to be compiled.
That's fine for experienced users who can search for used abstractions
and zip it all up, but what Pd currently lacks is any notion of
"export project" which does all that work for you.
This is why I still try to put everything into a single vanilla file when
giving patches to teach/demonstrate (rather than for my own use). I just
can't yet make any sensible assumption about what abstractions the user
has got (although that is changing now pd-extended is becoming more defined).
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Use the source
More information about the Pd-list