[PD] pd-extended some objects missing
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Jan 22 09:26:22 CET 2008
Ctrl Alt Back wrote:
> I had previously installed older versions of pd and pd-extended.
> Still is not clear to me if pd-extended actualy uses some files from pd
> installation.
> Installing of Pd-0.41.0-extended-20080121-debian-testing-i386.deb went
> very fast, so i suppose it re-uses packages from previous installation.
to my knowledge, this is not what the debian-package management does.
if you update a package, the old one will be removed and the new one
will be installed (with some exceptions in /etc). it should take equally
long.
pd-extended _used_ to install in /usr/local and thus would not interfere
with an existing puredata (debian package) installation which would go
to /usr.
iirc, hans wanted to fix this (that is: install pd-extended into /usr),
but i don't know whether he has already done so.
> It looks to me like a big mess i made, probably best to clean up
> everything and start all over ...
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:15:41PM +0100, Ctrl Alt Back wrote:
>> pix_record
>> ... couldn't create
>> pix_multiblob 6
>> ... couldn't create
>> (most of other objects from gem are ok)
> i found out i can create those while pd started as root
this most likely means that you are loading a different Gem version as
ordinary user and as root.
run pd in verbose mode and see what it says when loading Gem (and/or the
"missing" objects)
(since you hinted that you might have several versions of pd installed,
it might be that root is using /usr/bin/pd your ordinary account is
using /usr/local/bin/pd; this also effects the externals that might be
found automatically; but this also depends on your path-settings)
>
>> readdir
>> ... couldn't create
> but not this one and others
conclusion:
run "pd -verbose"
and
run "pd -version" and "which pd" to see which pds the 2 accounts are
actually using
mfgard
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list