[PD] fs1r & pd sysex

Timmy tim at dirtyhandbag.com
Sat Jan 26 12:44:28 CET 2008


random question,

just a thought, but do any of you think it would be possible to
build a sysex editor for something like a fs1r with pd ?

i have some software that i can edit it with, but i cant edit
it and play sequences with it at the same time.. its like the
editor has complete control over the midi port and wont
let it up to any other midi sequencer/program, i've tried using
a midi yoke, but that doesn't work either... sorry for the kind
of indirect pd question, i just wondered if i went about investing
some time into building something with pd i could still use
external software to record and playback sequences..

all the best

mr tim x

--

a man's life goes some ways
the way his life will be


pd-list-request at iem.at wrote:
> Send PD-list mailing list submissions to
> 	pd-list at iem.at
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	pd-list-request at iem.at
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	pd-list-owner at iem.at
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of PD-list digest..."
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: How to cite PD in an academic paper? (Hans-Christoph Steiner)
>    2. Re: visca camera control in pd? (B. Bogart)
>    3. Re: Mac OS X Intel autobuilds (brandon zeeb)
>    4. paranoid pd (naysayer)
>    5. Re: paranoid pd (Derek Holzer)
>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [PD] How to cite PD in an academic paper?
> From:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org>
> Date:
> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:08:33 -0500
> To:
> Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>
>
> To:
> Andy Farnell <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk>
> CC:
> pd-list at iem.at
>
>
>
> I generally use what I think the reader would be most interested in.  
> If there is something in the icmc96.ps paper that is related, I would 
> include that, otherwise, I use a misc entry with the 
> http://puredata.info URL.
>
> .hc
>
> On Jan 24, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:
>
>>
>> Use the @MISC bibtex entry
>> author: Puckette et al
>> date: 1996
>>
>> or you may prefer to cite this as a pointer
>>
>> http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Publications/icmc96.ps
>>
>> See for constructing MISC bibtex fields
>>
>> http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~jacobsd/bib/formats/bibtex.html
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:43:43 -0800
>> "B. Bogart" <ben at ekran.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Is there a specific way to cite Pure-Data in an academic paper? R
>>> outputs a bibtex entry when you call cite(). Is there some standard 
>>> for PD?
>>>
>>> OT: How is software generally cited?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> .b.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Use the source
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
> Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more 
> direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice, 
> it can change entire economies.     - Amy Smith
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [PD] visca camera control in pd?
> From:
> "B. Bogart" <ben at ekran.org>
> Date:
> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:07:20 -0800
> To:
> chris clepper <cgclepper at gmail.com>
>
> To:
> chris clepper <cgclepper at gmail.com>
> CC:
> pd-list at iem.at, Martin Peach <martin.peach at sympatico.ca>
>
>
> The elmo just says "Ack, ERR or Complete" but since multiple cameras can
> be diasychained then it gets more complex, which camera threw which error.
>
> Another thing to look into is the pan/tilt heads, I was looking at these
> as they are much more flexible, you can put any camera on em, but I did
> not look very far. (zoom is obviously trouble)
>
> have fun!
>
> .b.
>
> chris clepper wrote:
>   
>> On Jan 25, 2008 12:00 PM, Martin Peach <martin.peach at sympatico.ca
>> <mailto:martin.peach at sympatico.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>     <http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/docs/manuals/evihd1_tm.pdf>I've
>>     worked with a VISCA cam a few years ago. It just uses 9600 baud RS232
>>     serial, so [comport] can handle it. The harder part is parsing incoming
>>     messages.
>>
>>
>> Good to know it is possible.  What incoming messages need to be
>> handled?   I was thinking that Pd would just send messages to move the
>> cam around and not really need to know if the they are successful or not. 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>     
>
>
>
>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [PD] Mac OS X Intel autobuilds
> From:
> brandon zeeb <bsoisoi at mac.com>
> Date:
> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:05:36 -0500
> To:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org>
>
> To:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org>
> CC:
> pd-list list <pd-list at iem.at>
>
>
> Awesome, thanks for the info.  I'll take a look at it this weekend.  
> Should I forward any subsequent issues on this topic (ie: Pd on 10.5 
> and universal binaries) to the pd-dev list, or this one?
>
> I'll let you all know when I have the builds going.
>
> Cheers,
> ~Brandon
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>>
>> Cool.  It's not too hard to setup, here's how.  First use rsync to 
>> get the code:
>>
>> http://puredata.info/docs/developer/GettingPdSource
>>
>> Then install all the dependencies:
>>
>> http://puredata.info/docs/developer/darwin
>>
>> Then add the script to a cron job so it runs automatically:
>>
>> pure-data/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
>>
>> Universal builds for Pd-extended won't work, but it wouldn't be too 
>> hard to get working, and very much a worthwhile project.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:11 PM, bsoisoi wrote:
>>
>>> I have a 1.5ghz powerbook G4 with 2gb of RAM that is acting as a 
>>> server for me right now.  It is running 10.5.1, and I'm pretty sure 
>>> powerpc macs can build Universal Binary / Intel binaries.
>>>
>>> If someone can figure that out (or help me figure it out) I can 
>>> donate dedicated CPU time on this machine for nightly Pd-extended 
>>> PPC/Intel autobuilds.
>>>
>>> Let me know,
>>> ~Brandon
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:31 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't think anyone has done a 10.5 build or a universal build yet.
>>>> If someone wants to tackle that, then we can just have universal
>>>> builds every night on whatever machine AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>> .hc
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:28 PM, vade wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What machine is it hans/marius? Perhaps we can set aside an intel box
>>>>> for um, us researchers and we can leave it on :) Since I am probably
>>>>> around more than Hans is I can check on it periodically.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe PPC systems can compile intel builds, with 10.5, no (im not
>>>>> positive but I think you can target them??)? If so, we may have a
>>>>> spare machine for this at Poly we can put in the research area 
>>>>> that no
>>>>> one will mess with...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 20, 2008, at 10:20 PM, marius schebella wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> jan 17 has one.
>>>>>> the reason why the machine is down isvery trivial. the autobuild
>>>>>> process
>>>>>> was set up on a school machine which is in daily use by students and
>>>>>> good students turn off the machine during night. Afaik the machines
>>>>>> got
>>>>>> totally reset for the beginning of the new semester (starting with
>>>>>> jan22). don't know if it will be up again. hans?
>>>>>> marius.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bsoisoi wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there a reason there hasn't been an autobuild for Mac OS X x86
>>>>>>> since around 2007-12-07?  Do we know when we can expect the Intel
>>>>>>> builds to resume?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> ~Brandon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>>>>>>> listinfo/pd-list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>>>>>> listinfo/pd-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>>>>> listinfo/pd-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>> ----
>>>>
>>>> If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
>>>> exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
>>>> idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
>>>> it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into
>>>> the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess
>>>> himself of it.            - Thomas Jefferson
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>>
>>                            kill your television
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> [PD] paranoid pd
> From:
> naysayer <gateswideopen at gmail.com>
> Date:
> Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:42:58 +1100
> To:
> "Pd-List (E-mail)" <pd-list at iem.at>
>
> To:
> "Pd-List (E-mail)" <pd-list at iem.at>
>
>
> could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
> that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
> it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
> saved the patch or not.
>
> i hope i'm not being intolerant.
>
> thanks.
>
>
>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [PD] paranoid pd
> From:
> Derek Holzer <derek at umatic.nl>
> Date:
> Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:00:44 +0100
> To:
> naysayer <gateswideopen at gmail.com>
>
> To:
> naysayer <gateswideopen at gmail.com>
> CC:
> "Pd-List \(E-mail\)" <pd-list at iem.at>
>
>
> CTL + W is very close to CTL + E, so I for one am glad it's there.
>
> d.
>
> naysayer wrote:
>> could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
>> that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
>> it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
>> saved the patch or not.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080126/68f557f1/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list