[PD] vline~ question
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Sun Jan 27 02:58:30 CET 2008
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
> I think the question is, why have that book keeping available for
> vline~? Are there any practical uses for it?
>
> Otherwise, I don't see why it wouldn't be better to just accept a list
> like [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( where it starts at 0, goes to 1 in
> 1000 seconds, then goes to .5 in 1000 seconds, then goes to 0 in 2000
> seconds. Why even have the extra digit?
i cannot follow you here at all.
however, i would say that the 3rd digit is more or less useless (only
there for convenience) because you can get the same behaviour with
scheduled messages.
e.g.
[0, 1 1000 500(
|
[vline~]
is the same as
[t b b]
| |
[0( [del 500]
| |
| [1 1000(
+-----+
|
[vline~]
mfg,dr
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list