[PD] vline~ question

[Roman Haefeli]

On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 14:01 -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:

> I wonder how hard it would be to code a detector that counts to see if
> there are three element bundles in the message vs. two,

it would be very easy by using [list length], but it's not necessary
(see next paragraph).

>  and can
> process each accordingly, so that the old way still works but also the
> 'new way.' Does that make sense?

no, since there is actually no need to do that. you still can use
[vline~] as [line~]. if the third argument is not used, 0 is assumed,
which makes [vline~] behave as [line~] (it's still more accurate,
though). 

in other words: just forget about the third argument, if it confuses
you, and it won't do you any harm and it'll work as expected.

roman



		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de