[PD] vline~ question

Steffen Juul stffn at dibidut.dk
Mon Jan 28 22:17:11 CET 2008


On 27/01/2008, at 2.58, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
>> I think the question is, why have that book keeping available for
>> vline~? Are there any practical uses for it?
>>
>> Otherwise, I don't see why it wouldn't be better to just accept a  
>> list
>> like [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( where it starts at 0, goes to 1 in
>> 1000 seconds, then goes to .5 in 1000 seconds, then goes to 0 in 2000
>> seconds. Why even have the extra digit?
>
> i cannot follow you here at all.

Kyle wants to, correct me if i'm wrong, translate

[0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000 1000, 0 2000 2000(
|
[vline~]

into

[0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000(
|
[nothirdVline~]

That is have the object do the delay bookkeeping.

Or maybe this would to instead:

[0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000(
|
[vlineBookkeeper]
|
[vline~]




More information about the Pd-list mailing list