[PD] pd thunder
chris at mccormick.cx
Thu Feb 7 03:58:49 CET 2008
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +0000, Andy Farnell wrote:
> As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there
> is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere,
> (and one assumes no matter is transformed to energy) - well NO2 and O3
> are produced, but that doesn't account for the volume.
Really? I'm not so sure about that.
More information about the Pd-list