[PD] smoothing control signals

[B. Bogart]

[smooth] in pixelTANGO does just lop in message domain, written by
Thomas Grill. Should just work in pd extended...

.b.

Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote:
> 
>> I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in
>> equal amounts!
>>
> yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now).
> i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration
> and therefore are willing to help.
> 
>> Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a
>> control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs,
>> archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using
>> [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my
>> patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on.
> 
> yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to
> go into the audio domain. 
>> I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as
>> it seems to me like quite a useful function.
> 
> definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the
> most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to
> have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch,
> which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain.
> 
> roman
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________ 
> Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>