[PD] the behaviour of [list length] has changed!!
Miller Puckette
mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Wed Feb 20 17:52:24 CET 2008
Even smarter might be to skip Pd-extended 0.40 and go straight from
0.39 to 0.41.
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:44:54PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> > obviously it is incompatible. the reason to nevertheless do change it
> > was, that [list length] was not introduced before 0.40, which keeps the
> > potential number of victims low (esp. since Pd-extended has not yet made
> > it so far); if the behaviour ever needs to be changed, better do it NOW
> > than later.
> >
>
> which reminds me: i think it would be good if Pd-extended-0.40 would
> have a fixed version of [list length].
>
> fgmadsr.
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list