[PD] Saving Gem output as video file on MacOSX ?
marius schebella
marius.schebella at gmail.com
Fri Feb 29 21:33:57 CET 2008
hey dudley,
I think at this point it would help to see your patch...
marius.
Dudley Brooks wrote:
> chris clepper wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Dudley Brooks
>> <dbrooks at runforyourlife.org <mailto:dbrooks at runforyourlife.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> In short: How do you use snap/pix_snap/pix_record (or maybe something
>> else and pix_snap?) to capture the output of a *complicated* patch?
>>
>>
>> [gemhead 99]
>> |
>> |
>> [pix_snap]
>>
>>
>>
> Of course! Ingenious!
>
> However ... I tried it, and, even though the frame count output of
> pix_record churned out frame numbers, the resulting file was only one
> frame long and that frame only showed one of the geos. I even made the
> priorities of the various geos' gemheads explicitly lower and it still
> didn't work.
>
> I can't figure out why that particular geo registered -- none of the
> geo's were connected to pix_snap. That's the intention, right? I also
> tried connecting several of the geos to pix_snap and the results were
> still the same: the movie had only one frame, which contained only one
> geo -- even when that particular geo was the only one which was *not*
> connected to pix_snap. So the connections were irrelevant.
>
> I assume it has something to do with rendering/buffering, but I don't
> know enough about those.
>
> -- Dudley
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list