[PD] bang~ <=64 samples

[marius schebella]

hi miller,
not exaclty sure what sub-64-sample message delays means?
block~ 64 64? or 64 delays each 0.0226757369615 ms.
will test this.
marius.

Miller Puckette wrote:
> You can do it combining bang~ with sub-64-sample message delays.
> 
> cheers
> M
> 
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:05:46PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
>> hi,
>> is there an alternative for bang~ that will work with blocksizes smaller 
>> than 64 samples?
>> or is there a chance to fix bang~?
>> marius.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>