[PD] phasor~ usage question

[PSPunch]

Frank,



> The theory for this technique is here: 
> http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node187.html
 > (snip)
> Basically the whole construct below each [wrap~] is just the equation
> from there in Pd patch format.

Thanks Frank, the whole thing makes since now.


> Not really: Numbers directly connected to [phasor~]'s first inlet get
> converted to a constant signal inside of [phasor~] automatically now.
> IIRC this wasn't the case for older versions of Pd, and then you had
> to use a [sig~] in between to do the conversion from message to
> signal.

Studying *nix in parallel with Pd, I am almost about to build a habit of 
assuming that anything looking obscure at first sight is there simply 
for "historical reasons" :)


Thanks again.

--
David Shimamoto