[PD] delread~ [was: Re: declare]
Frank Barknecht
fbar at footils.org
Tue Apr 1 08:50:26 CEST 2008
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> it was just an idea... that way you will not have the problem of the one
> block delay of delread~.
First: If you sort the delread~ before the delwrite~ you will always
have one block of delay.
But anyway: Automatic sorting of delread/delwrite doesn't solve the
problem you talk about: For feedback delays you want to have the
delread before the delwrite, for non-feedback delay lines you want to
the delwrite before the delread.
Again, please read the delay chapter in Miller's book for a detailed
explanation:
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node120.html
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> >
> >> [[btw. can't we use that method to have all delread~
> >> saved and loaded at the beginning of a patch?]]
> >
> > Why t.h. would you want that?!?
> >
> > Ciao
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list