[PD] "dsp..." messages into inlets (!!!)
Miller Puckette
mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Tue Apr 1 18:24:48 CEST 2008
Oops! I'm using "dsp" for objects to intercommunicate, but I had meant
to protect anyone from stumbling on it. Obviously I missed something.
I can suggest many possible workarounds, but will get around to fixing this
someday.
cheers
Miller
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 06:05:37PM +0200, matteo sisti sette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This must have been discussed in the list before, but I couldn't find
> anything in the archives because it's difficult to generate a
> meaningful set of keywords for this......
>
> In a merely fortuitous way, I found out that if you send a message
> starting with the keyword "dsp" into an inlet of a subpatch or
> abstraction, it is not passed through the inlet.
>
> Attached is an example, i.e.:
>
> [ (
> |
> [pd mysubpatch]
>
> where the subpatch contains:
>
> [inlet]
> |
> [print]
>
> If you write "dsp something" in the message and click it, the message
> won't be printed!!!! (while any other message will)
>
> It seems like the inlet itself "catches" it...
>
> I don't know what [inlet] is supposed to do with messages starting with "dsp".
> I thought it may perhaps switch~ off the subpatch, but it doesn't.
>
> Is this a bug or a feature?
> Is it documented somewhere?
>
> Thanks
> m.
>
>
> --
> Matteo Sisti Sette
> matteosistisette at gmail.com
> http://www.matteosistisette.com
> #N canvas 667 288 450 300 12;
> #N canvas 689 62 450 300 mysubpatch 0;
> #X obj 169 51 inlet;
> #X obj 169 96 print DATA;
> #X connect 0 0 1 0;
> #X restore 147 184 pd mysubpatch;
> #X msg 80 124 1 2 3;
> #X msg 120 92 bla bla bla;
> #X msg 153 148 dsp 1;
> #X connect 1 0 0 0;
> #X connect 2 0 0 0;
> #X connect 3 0 0 0;
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list