[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Tue Apr 22 00:59:46 CEST 2008


And to stir the pot, expr is GPL, almost all the rest of Pd is BSD,  
so you might not always be able to use expr.

.hc

On Apr 21, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:

>
> Yes. Please don't take this the wrong way Derek, I sincerely  
> appreciate
> the suggestion.
>
> Everything can be done with [expr~], so why don't we just rename Pd
> to [expr~]? :)
>
> Seriously, raising one number to a power is an essential,  
> fundamental operation
> Is there any plausible excuse for its omission from core Pd?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:53:00 +0200
> Derek Holzer <derek at umatic.nl> wrote:
>
>> Can the job be done with [expr~]?
>>
>> d.
>>
>> Andy Farnell wrote:
>>> Did I read that Cyclone is to be incorporated into vanilla Pd?
>>>
>>> Having discovered too late that [pow~] is not part of vanilla
>>> I am about to remove the constraint of using vanilla Pd for
>>> the synthetic sound design book since it is incomplete without
>>> basic mathematical  operators.
>>>
>>> andy
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ::: http://blog.myspace.com/ 
>> macumbista
>> ---Oblique Strategy # 190:
>> "You can only make one dot at a time"
>
>
> -- 
> Use the source
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list





------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said,  
hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out  
another pink-collar temp pool day.  - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf






More information about the Pd-list mailing list